Fraud & Verification
Correct banking vocabulary is not proof. Learn how to slow down a transaction, separate claims, and ask the right bank through a channel you established independently.
For any real instrument, ask your own regulated bank to establish whether it has received and authenticated relevant bank communications through its normal channels. This site cannot confirm authenticity, drawability, availability or credit approval.
Recognise the patterns
Why correct terminology cannot authenticate the deal.
Open guide →Fake SWIFT messagesWhat a copy, screenshot and alleged MT number cannot establish.
Open guide →Cloned banks and contactsLookalike domains, unverifiable officers and false callbacks.
Open guide →Advance fees and instrument providersQuestion the fee, counterparty and proposed bank path.
Open guide →Instrument wording trapsClaims about transfer, assignment or payment may mislead.
Open guide →Unrealistic returns and monetisationWhy an instrument does not equal approved financing.
Open guide →Verify before you payPractical verification questions before sending money.
Open guide →Independent verificationEscalating uncertainties to the correct institutions.
Four separate questions
- Identity: who is the real financial institution and how did you independently identify its official channel?
- Message: what communication, if any, has your bank actually received and checked?
- Undertaking: what binding promise exists, under which conditions and governing rules?
- Commercial claim: does a separate lender or purchaser truly agree to provide the promised financing?
No one answer proves the others. If pressured to send an urgent “release”, “registration” or “SWIFT activation” fee, stop and seek independent professional advice.